4.8 Article

Direct evidence of gradient Mn(II) evolution at charged states in LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 electrodes with capacity fading

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 273, Issue -, Pages 1120-1126

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.013

Keywords

LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4; Lithium ion battery; Electrolyte degradation; Manganese dissolution; Soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy

Funding

  1. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. 973 Projects [2010CB833102, 2012CB932900]
  3. NSFC [51222210]
  4. 100 Talent Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mn evolution has long been considered critical for understanding the capacity fading of spinel electrodes in batteries. However, the detailed mechanism is still under debate; chemical evolution and distribution of the detrimental Mn is yet to be experimentally clarified. Here we perform a comparative soft X-ray absorption spectroscopic study on two batches of LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 with the same bulk spinel phase, but different electrochemical performance. By virtue of the sensitivity of soft X-ray to the transition-metal 3d states and oxygen 2p states, evolutions of Ni, Mn, and O in LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 are compared between the two batches of electrodes. In the LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 with fast capacity fading, Mn2+ is evidently observed in the initial charge cycle. Strikingly, the Mn2+ content is notably high at the fully charged state. This sharply contradicts the conventional wisdom that Mn2+ evolves from a disproportional reaction favored in the discharged state. Additionally, the shallow probe depth of soft X-ray spectroscopy enables another finding that Mn2+ manifests itself mostly on the side of the electrode facing separator. Our comparative study provides direct experimental evidence on the association between Mn2+ and performance failure. It strongly suggests that Mn2+ formation is mostly determined by electrode-electrolyte surface reactions, instead of disproportional reactions. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available