4.7 Article

Characteristics of residential energy consumption in China: Findings from a household survey

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 75, Issue -, Pages 126-135

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.07.016

Keywords

Household survey; Energy consumption; China

Funding

  1. Renmin University of China [11XNL009, 13XNJ016, 13XNJ017, 14XNJ011]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Ministry of Education Foundation of China [12YJCZH021]
  3. National Science Foundation of China [41201582]
  4. Sida through Gothenburg University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comprehensive survey of 1450 households in 26 Chinese provinces was undertaken in 2012 to identify the characteristics and potential driving forces of residential energy consumption in China. The survey covers six areas: household characteristics, dwelling characteristics, kitchen and home appliances, space heating and cooling, residential transportation, and electricity billing, metering, and pricing options. The results show that a typical Chinese household in 2012 consumed 1426 kilograms standard coal equivalent, which is approximately 44 percent of the 2009 level in the United States and 38 percent of the 2008 level in the EU-27. District heating, natural gas, and electricity are three major residential energy sources, while space heating, cooking, and water heating are three major end-use activities. Moreover, the results suggest a large urban-rural gap in terms of energy sources and purpose of usage. Commercial energy is used mainly for space heating in urban areas, while biomass dominates mainly for cooking purpose in rural areas. The survey results can help decision makers and scholars identify energy conservation opportunities, and evaluate the effectiveness of energy policies. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available