4.7 Article

Transition pathways for a UK low carbon electricity future

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 52, Issue -, Pages 10-24

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.001

Keywords

Transition pathways; Governance patterns; Action space

Funding

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) and E.ON UK (the integrated energy company) [EP/F022832/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/K005316/1, EP/F022832/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K005316/1, EP/F022832/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Achieving long-term targets for greenhouse gas emissions reductions, such as the UK's legally-binding target of reducing its emissions by 80% by 2050, will require a transition in systems for meeting and shaping energy service demands, involving radical substitution to low-carbon supply technologies and improvements in end-use energy efficiency. This paper describes the development and high-level analysis of a set of transition pathways to a UK low carbon electricity system, explaining key features of the core pathways developed and the distinctiveness and value of the approach. The pathways use an 'action space' concept to explore the dynamic interactions between choices made by actors, which are influenced by the competing governance 'framings' or 'logics' that different actors pursue. The paper sets out three core transition pathways - Market Rules, Central Co-ordination and Thousand Flowers, in which market, government and civil society logics respectively dominate. It summarises the key technological and institutional changes in these pathways, and the roles of actors in bringing these about. This leads to an identification of the key risks to the realisation of each of the pathways, and of the challenges for individuals, businesses, social movements and policy-makers in taking action to bring them about and sustain them. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available