4.7 Article

The value of social networks in the diffusion of energy-efficiency innovations in UK households

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 53, Issue -, Pages 159-168

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.039

Keywords

Residential energy demand; Social capital; Energy-efficiency innovations

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/I02929X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I02929X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The UK Government has policy goals for increasing energy efficiency in existing homes. However, there are doubts that standard technology and behavioural innovations will be adopted widely enough in time to achieve the targets. Diffusion of innovation theory states that the communication of information on innovations through a social system encourages adoption. Social capital theory states that interpersonal communication is a key means of gaining resources, such as information on energy-efficiency innovations, for attaining certain goals. Case study research of three British communities was conducted in 2009 in order to understand the influence of social capital on information diffusion regarding the adoption of household energy-efficiency measures. The findings show that while standard campaigns may account for two-thirds of information-seeking behaviour, they may not be addressing up to one-third of information-seekers who would prefer to speak to people they know. Findings also indicate that seeking information amongst personal contacts is often associated with adoption of energy-efficiency innovations, increasing the likelihood of adoption by up to four times, but that there are important differences between types of innovations and communities. Tailoring campaigns to communities' communication channels is therefore imperative. These findings have important implications for informing community-based energy-efficiency programmes. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available