4.7 Article

Energy efficiency, CO2 emission performance and technology gaps in fossil fuel electricity generation in Korea: A meta-frontier non-radial directional distance function analysis

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages 653-662

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.033

Keywords

Electricity generation; Non-radial directional distance function; CO2 emission performance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71273005]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-10-0073]
  3. Humanities and Social Science Foundation of the Ministry of Education [12YJCZH039]
  4. NUAA [NJ20120010, NJ20120015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a meta-frontier non-radial directional distance function to model energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation. This approach allows for the consideration of the group heterogeneity of electricity generation, non-radial slacks, and undesirable outputs simultaneously. We extend several standardized indices to measure total-factor energy efficiency, CO2 emission performance, and technology gaps in electricity generation. We estimate the potential reductions in energy use and CO2 emissions under different technology assumptions. We conduct an empirical analysis of fossil fuel electricity generation in Korea by using the proposed approach. The results indicate that coal-fired power plants show higher levels of total-factor energy efficiency and CO2 emission performance than oil-fired ones. Under the meta-frontier technology assumption, coal-fired power plants show a smaller technology gap than oil-fired ones. This suggests that the Korean government should promote technological innovation to reduce technology gaps for oil-fired plants,,thereby improving energy and CO2 emission performance and meeting emission reduction targets in the electricity generation industry. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available