4.8 Article

Preparation and characterization of Ce0.8Y0.2-xCuxO2-δ as electrolyte for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 278, Issue -, Pages 420-429

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.073

Keywords

Solid oxide fuel cells; Electrolyte; Sol-gel auto-combustion method; Conductivity

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [51102073]
  2. Key Laboratory for Advanced Technology in Environmental Protection of Jiangsu Province [AE201361]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province of China [1308085QB35, 1408085QE81]
  4. outstanding young talent project in Colleges and Universities of Anhui Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, ultrafine Ce0.8Y0.2-xO2-delta (for x = 0.00, 0.04, 0.08, 0.12, 0.16, 0.20) powders have been successfully prepared by sol gel auto-combustion method. The samples were characterized by FTIR, TG-DSC, XRD, Raman spectroscopy, BET, TEM, SEM, AC impedance, and thermal expansion measurements. The results indicated that Ce0.8Y0.2-xCuxO2-delta powders with highly phase-pure cubic fluorite-type structure were obtained after calcining at 700 degrees C for 2 h; the average crystallite sizes were between 11.3 and 17.9 nm. The as-synthesized powders exhibited high sintering activity, Ce0.8Y0.2-xCuxO2-delta series electrolytes which have higher relatively dense over 95% can obtain after sintering at 1300 degrees C for 4 h Ce0.8Y0.12Cu0.08O1.86 electrolyte sintered at 1300 degrees C for 4 h exhibits the highest oxide ionic conductivity (sigma(800) (degrees C) = 0.029 S cm(-1)), lowest electrical activation energy (E-a = 0.75 eV) and moderate thermal expansion coefficient (TEC = 13.5 x 10(-6) K-1, between 25 and 800 degrees C). Therefore, it was concluded that co-doping with appropriate ratio of Y/Cu can further improve the properties of ceria electrolytes. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available