4.8 Article

Composite membranes for alkaline electrolysis based on polysulfone and mineral fillers

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 291, Issue -, Pages 163-172

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.066

Keywords

Alkaline electrolysis; Membrane gas separator; Phase inversion; Barite; Resistivity; Gas purity

Funding

  1. European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) [278824]
  2. Swiss BFE in the PD project PALE
  3. Swisselectric research in the project alkaline electrolysis for renewable energy generation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mineral-based membranes for high temperature alkaline electrolysis were developed by a phase inversion process with polysulfone as binder. The long-term stability of new mineral fillers: wollastonite, forsterite and barite was assessed by 8000 h-long leaching experiments (5.5 M KOH, 85 degrees C) combined with thermodynamic modelling. Barite has released only 6.22 10-4 M of Ba ions into the electrolyte and was selected as promising filler material, due to its excellent stability. Barite-based membranes, prepared by the phase inversion process, were further studied. The resistivity of these membranes in 5.5 M KOH was investigated as a function of membrane thickness and total porosity, hydrodynamic porosity as well as gas purities determined by conducting electrolysis at ambient conditions. It was found that a dense top layer resulting from the phase inversion process, shows resistivity values up to 451.0 +/- 22 Omega cm, which is two orders of magnitude higher than a porous bulk membrane microstructure (3.89 Omega cm). Developed membranes provided hydrogen purity of 99.83 at 200 mA cm(-2), which is comparable to previously used chrysotile membranes and higher than commercial state-of-the-art Zirfon 500utp membrane. These cost-effective polysulfone - barite membranes are promising candidates as asbestos replacement for commercial applications. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available