Journal
ENERGY POLICY
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 6-22Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.028
Keywords
Electricity generation mix; Portfolio theory; Regional energy policy
Funding
- Engineering and Physical Science Research Council through SuperGen Marine Energy Consortium (EPSRC) [EP/E040136/1]
- EPSRC [EP/E040136/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E040136/1] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Standalone levelised cost assessments of electricity supply options miss an important contribution that renewable and non-fossil fuel technologies can make to the electricity portfolio: that of reducing the variability of electricity costs, and their potentially damaging impact upon economic activity. Portfolio theory applications to the electricity generation mix have shown that renewable technologies, their costs being largely uncorrelated with non-renewable technologies, can offer such benefits. We look at the existing Scottish generation mix and examine drivers of changes out to 2020. We assess recent scenarios for the Scottish generation mix in 2020 against mean-variance efficient portfolios of electricity-generating technologies. Each of the scenarios studied implies a portfolio cost of electricity that is between 22% and 38% higher than the portfolio cost of electricity in 2007. These scenarios prove to be mean-variance inefficient in the sense that, for example, lower variance portfolios can be obtained without increasing portfolio costs, typically by expanding the share of renewables. As part of extensive sensitivity analysis, we find that Wave and Tidal technologies can contribute to lower risk electricity portfolios, while not increasing portfolio cost. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available