4.7 Article

The impacts of carbon tax and complementary policies on Chinese economy

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 38, Issue 11, Pages 7278-7285

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.055

Keywords

Carbon tax; China; Complementary policy

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2007BAC03A12-3]
  2. National Social Science Fund of China [092D029]
  3. Asia Research Center in Tsinghua University [2006C2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Under the pressure of global warming, it is imperative for Chinese government to impose effective policy instruments to promote domestic energy saving and carbon emissions reduction. As one of the most important incentive-based policy instruments, carbon tax has sparked a lively controversy in China. This paper explores the impact of carbon tax on Chinese economy, as well as the cushion effects of the complementary policies, by constructing a dynamic recursive general equilibrium model. The model can describe the new equilibrium for each sequential independent period (e.g. one year) after carbon tax and the complementary policies are imposed, and thus describe the long-term impacts of the policies. The simulation results show that carbon tax is an effective policy tool because it can reduce carbon emissions with a little negative impact on economic growth; reducing indirect tax in the meantime of imposing carbon tax will help to reduce the negative impact of the tax on production and competitiveness: in addition, giving households subsidy in the meantime will help to stimulate household consumptions. Therefore, complementary policies used together with carbon tax will help to cushion the negative impacts of carbon tax on the economy. The dynamic CGE analysis shows the impact of carbon tax policy on the GDP is relatively small, but the reduction of carbon emission is relatively large. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved,

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available