4.7 Article

Techno-economic and off-design analysis of stand-alone, distributed-scale reversible solid oxide cell energy storage systems

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 175, Issue -, Pages 263-277

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.08.087

Keywords

Reversible fuel cells; Flow battery; Solid oxide; Energy storage; Techno-economic; Distributed energy resource

Funding

  1. Stanford University Global Climate and Energy Project [51922]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reversible solid oxide cells may be a cost competitive energy storage technology at the distributed scale. Leveraging C-O-H chemistry and operating near 600 degrees C allows the cells to be exothermic in both modes, improving efficiency and operability. This study characterizes ReSOC balance-of-plant hardware off-design performance to investigate component mode compatibility, the effect of tank dynamics, and part-load performance for a 100 kW/800 kWh plant. We also introduce a variable volume floating piston tank concept to improve energy storage density and evaluate operability advantages. Results show that with proper system design, balance-of-plant components are compatible, and tank dynamics have minimal impact when tanks are uninsulated and designed for storage near ambient temperature. System AC roundtrip efficiency is between 53% and 54%, depending on the tank technology selected and the compressor operating approach. Energy density is 84.4 kWh/m(3) for rigid tanks, and 146.1 kWh/m(3) for the variable volume tank concept at 100 bar storage pressure. This study also shows that ReSOC systems can maintain high efficiency at part-loads as low as 15% of rated capacity, Economic analysis of the system estimates an installed capital cost of $422-452/kWh, and a levelized cost of storage of 18.8-19.6 (sic)/kWh, values competitive with state-of-the-art battery technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available