4.7 Article

Process simulation of oxy-fuel combustion for a 300 MW pulverized coal-fired power plant using Aspen Plus

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 76, Issue -, Pages 581-587

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.08.007

Keywords

Oxy-fuel combustion; Process simulation; Component of flue gas; Aspen Plus; Coal-fired power plant (CFPP)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51176009]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2013YJS078, 2013YJS069]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work focuses on the amounts and components of flue gas for oxy-fuel combustion in a coal-fired power plant (CFPP). The combustion process of pulverized coal in a 300 MW power plant is studied using Aspen Plus software. The amount of each component in flue gas in coal-fired processes with air or O-2/CO2 as oxidizer is obtained. The differences between the two processes are identified, and the influences of temperature, excess oxygen ratio and molar fraction of O-2/CO2 on the proportions of different components in flue gas are examined by sensitivity analysis. The process simulation results show that replacing atmospheric air by a 21%O-2/79%CO2 mixture leads the decrease of the flame temperature from 1789 degrees C to 1395 degrees C. The equilibrium amount of NO declines obviously but the SO, are still at the same level. The mass fraction of CO2 in flue gas increased from 21.3% to 81.5%. The amount of NO is affected sensitively by the change of temperature and the excess oxygen ratio, but the change of O-2/CO2 molar fraction has a little influence to the generation of NOx. With the increasing of O-2 concentration, the flame temperature and NO emission enhance rapidly. When the molar fraction of O-2 increases to 30%, the flame temperature is similar and the mass fraction of NOx is about 1/8 of that air atmosphere. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available