4.7 Review

The reliability of technological systems with high energy efficiency in residential buildings

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages 19-24

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.09.027

Keywords

Residential buildings; Civil plants; Energy efficiency; Availability; Reliability; MTBF; MTTR; Maintenance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study wants to highlight the importance of the reliability parameters because of some changes that occurred in modern technology; as for example the necessity of more sophisticated equipments or plants transformed from an auxiliary service to being an actual part of the systems they were originally intended for. Reliability, maintainability and availability are essential features if we want to define the quality that is the ability, of the plant to fulfill a specific requirement. Obviously analyzing the reliability is useful for those plants that must guarantee an uninterrupted service, thus making an estimation of the probability that a malfunctioning, either of component or a security system, can generate an accidental sequence generating a downtime. Even in plants which do not risk the occurrence of a considerable incident, the analysis of reliability can affect positively costs regarding both security and management. The importance of reliability parameters increases when those requirements the system must fulfill change. Anyway these systems have a safe impact on the costs of exertion and management. Such costs will be added to the ones produced by the energy consumption of the plant. By using the word costs we mean: installation and management costs; a high efficient and reliable plant usually has high installation costs and low exertion costs. The opposite situation occurs in highly maintainable plants only under specific circumstances. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available