4.7 Article

The reality of English living rooms - A comparison of internal temperatures against common model assumptions

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 66, Issue -, Pages 688-696

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.025

Keywords

BREDEM; Building stock models; Heating demand temperature; Heating duration; Internal temperature; Variability

Funding

  1. People Energy and Buildings: Distribution, Diversity and Dynamics [EP/H051112/1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  3. EDF Energy
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [GR/S94377/01, EP/K011839/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/K011839/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study examines the extent that temperatures in English living rooms correspond to standard assumptions made in established UK building stock models. Methods: Spot temperature measurements taken every 45 min over 92 winter days in 248 homes in England were analyzed and compared to the assumed thermostat setting of 21 degrees C inside and outside the assumed heating periods. Results: Homes on average displayed lower internal temperatures during assumed heating periods and significantly shorter durations of heating to 21 degrees C than common models assume, with about 20% of homes never reaching the assumed demand temperature of 21 degrees C. Data showed a difference of only about 45 min in the duration of temperatures at or above the demand temperature for weekdays and weekends, contrary to the assumed difference of 7 h. Variability between homes was large. Conclusion: These findings suggest that currently used standard assumptions of heating demand and heating duration do not accurately reflect the living room temperatures of dwellings in England. Practice implications: Standard assumptions might have to be revised, in particular regarding the weekday-weekend differentiation. The prediction of internal temperature for a given home contains potential large error when using standard assumptions. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available