4.7 Article

LCC and LCCO2 analysis of green roofs in elementary schools with energy saving measures

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 45, Issue -, Pages 229-239

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.11.006

Keywords

Green roof systems; Energy saving measures; Elementary school; Life cycle cost; Life cycle CO2

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education. Science and Technology [2011-0005086, 2011-0018360]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0008452, 2011-0018360] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As the area of urban forests rapidly decrease in size, there is growing interest in green roofs as the only alternative to urban forests. This study aimed to evaluate economic and environmental effects of functional improvement in elementary school facilities by applying various improvement scenarios based on green roof systems (GRSs) with the combination of energy-saving measures (ESMs). A total of 16 possible improvement scenarios from the combination of GRSs and ESMs were developed, and energy modeling (Energy Plus ver. 6.0), based on the (i) characteristics of building, (ii) regional climate, and (iii) season, was performed. Using the energy modeling result, the amount of the CO2 emission reduction by energy savings and the CO2 absorption by GRSs' plants was calculated, and a life cycle cost analysis was conducted with the consideration of the life cycle CO2 (LCCO2). The results of this study can be used (i) to introduce the most appropriate ESMs for the specific facility when applying GRSs, (ii) to decide which location is proper to implement GRSs considering characteristics of regional climate, and (iii) to select energy- and cost-efficient elementary school when applying GRSs. (c) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available