4.7 Article

Ideal efficiency analysis and comparison of condensing and liquid desiccant dehumidification

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 49, Issue -, Pages 575-583

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.03.012

Keywords

Condensing dehumidification; Liquid desiccant dehumidification; Ideal process; Unified expression; Exergy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51138005]
  2. foundation for the author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of China [201049]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, ideal dehumidification process is achieved by both condensing dehumidification and liquid desiccant dehumidification methods, and the minimum input work and ideal COP of the two dehumidification methods are derived. For liquid desiccant dehumidification, the humidity ratio of regeneration air is the most important influencing factor of COP. For condensing dehumidification, the temperature of heat sink is the most important influencing factor of COP. The essence of dehumidification is transportation of moisture between indoor and outdoor two different humidity ratios. Exhaust heat into heat sink in condensing dehumidification method and exhaust moisture into moisture sink in liquid desiccant dehumidification mode can be compared, due to the fact that heat and moisture are unified in saturated line. The two dehumidification modes will have the same performance, when heat sink of condensing dehumidification is dew point of outdoor air by indirect evaporation or outdoor air is saturated. Otherwise, the ideal COP of condensing dehumidification will be lower than liquid desiccant dehumidification process. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available