4.7 Article

Performance analysis of liquid desiccant based air-conditioning system under variable fresh air ratios

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 42, Issue 12, Pages 2457-2464

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.08.027

Keywords

Liquid desiccant; Air-conditioning; Performance analysis; Fresh air ventilation

Funding

  1. Internal Competitive Research Grant (ICRG) of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University [G-YG49]
  2. Environment and Conservation Fund (ECF) of Hong Kong

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In conventional air-conditioning system, fresh air volume is always restricted to save energy, which sacrifices indoor air quality (IAQ) to some extent. However, removing the latent load of air by liquid desiccant rather than by cooling is an alternative way of reducing energy consumption. Therefore, IAQ can be improved by increasing the volume of fresh air introduced into an air-conditioning system. In this paper, a liquid desiccant based air-conditioning system is studied, with the system performance under various fresh air ratios analyzed using simulation tests. In addition, the proposed system and a conventional system are compared. In the proposed system, with the increase in fresh air ratio, the heating load for solution regeneration rises, the dehumidification efficiency increases and the regeneration efficiency drops. The coefficient of performance (COP) of the liquid desiccant based system decreases sharply when the fresh air ratio exceeds 60%. The results also show that the proposed system can save power notably. The maximum power saving ratio is 58.9% when the fresh air ratio is 20%; however, the ratio drops when the fresh air ratio increases. These findings will be beneficial in the selection of fresh air ventilation strategies for liquid desiccant based air-conditioning systems. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available