4.7 Article

Investigation of Combined Supports for Cu-Based Oxygen Carriers for Chemical-Looping with Oxygen Uncoupling (CLOU)

Journal

ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages 3918-3927

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ef401161s

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Social Fund
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [PN-ENE2010-19550]
  3. Vattenfall and Chalmers University of Technology via the Energy Area of Advance
  4. CSIC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU) process is a novel solution for efficient combustion with inherent separation of carbon dioxide. The process uses a metal oxide as an oxygen carrier to transfer oxygen from an air to a fuel reactor. In the fuel reactor, the metal oxide releases gas phase oxygen, which oxidizes the fuel through normal combustion. In this study, Cu-based oxygen carrier materials that combine different supports of MgAl2O4, TiO2, and SiO2 are prepared and characterized with the objective of obtaining highly reactive and attrition resistant particles. The oxygen carrier particles were produced by spray-drying and were calcined at different temperatures ranging from 950 to 1030 degrees C for 4 h. The chemical-looping performance of the oxygen carriers was examined in a batch fluidized-bed reactor in the temperature range of 900-950 degrees C under alternating reducing and oxidizing conditions. The mechanical stability of the oxygen carriers was tested in a jet-cup attrition rig. All of the oxygen carriers showed oxygen uncoupling behavior with oxygen concentrations close to equilibrium. During reactivity tests with methane, oxygen carriers with lower mechanical stability showed higher reactivity, yielding almost complete fuel conversion. Oxygen carrier materials based on support mixtures of MgAl2O4/TiO2, MgAl2O4/SiO2, and TiO2/SiO2 showed a combination of high mechanical stability, low attrition rates, good reactivity with methane, and oxygen uncoupling behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available