4.7 Article

Heavy Petroleum Composition. 3. Asphaltene Aggregation

Journal

ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 1246-1256

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ef3018578

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) Division of Materials Research [DMR-06-54118]
  2. Shell Global Solutions
  3. Nalco (an Ecolab Company)
  4. Florida State University
  5. State of Florida

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Molecular characterization of asphaltenes by conventional analytical techniques is a challenge because of their compositional complexity, high heteroatom content, and asphaltene aggregate formation at low concentrations. Thus, most common characterization techniques rely on bulk properties or solution-phase behavior (solubility). Proposed over 20 years ago, the Boduszynski model proposes a continuous progression in petroleum composition (molecular weight, structure, and heteroatom content) as a function of the atmospheric equivalent boiling point. Although exhaustive detailed compositional analysis of petroleum distillates validates the continuum model, the available compositional data from asphaltene fractions supports the extension of the continuum model into the nondistillables only indirectly. Asphaltenes, defined by their insolubility in alkane solvents, accumulate in high-boiling fractions and form stable aggregate structures at low parts per billion (ppb) concentrations, far below the concentration required for most mass analyzers. Here, we present direct mass spectral detection of stable asphaltene aggregates at lower concentrations than previously published and observe the onset of asphaltene nanoaggregate formation by time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOF-MS). We conclude that a fraction of asphaltenes must be present as nanoaggregates (not monomers) in all atmospheric pressure and laser-based ionization methods. Thus, those methods access a subset of the asphaltene continuum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available