4.7 Article

Effect of Operational Variables on the Hydrogasification of Inner Mongolian Lignite Semicoke

Journal

ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages 4589-4597

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ef4007092

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB723105]
  2. National Science and Technology Pillar Program [2012BAA04B03]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [51274147]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydrogasification of Inner Mongolian lignite semicoke was investigated at varying operational conditions: grain size of 0.15-0.7 mm, hydrogen flow rate of 300-1500 mL/min, temperature of 700-900 degrees C, pressure of 0.1-5.0 MPa, and heating rate of 10-30 degrees C/min, using a self-developed high-temperature and high-pressure fixed-bed reactor with a design parameter of 1000 degrees C and 12 MPa. The reaction characteristics and mechanism of semicoke hydrogasification were discussed. The results showed that, at a grain size of semicoke of <0.25 mm and a hydrogen flow rate of >1200 mL/min, the effects of internal and external diffusion resistances were basically eliminated; the increase of the pressure or heating rate exerted a positive influence on the hydrogasification of semicoke. The optimum reaction conditions were as follows: grain size of 0.25-0.35 mm, hydrogen flow rate of 1200 mL/min, temperature of 800 degrees C, and pressure of 3.0-4.0 MPa. During hydrogasification, the fracture of alkyl side chains, hydrogenation/methanation of carbon (e.g., C + 2H(2) = CH4), and hydrogenation of oxygen-containing structures were accelerated. Three stages occurred during hydrogasification of Inner Mongolian lignite semicoke: hydropyrolysis stage, rapid hydrogasification stage, and slow hydrogasification stage. Moreover, the reaction characteristics of each stage were quite different because of distinct carbon structures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available