4.7 Article

Comparison of Emissions from Wood Combustion. Part 2: Impact of Combustion Conditions on Emission Factors and Characteristics of Particle-Bound Organic Species and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH)-Related Toxicological Potential

Journal

ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 1482-1491

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ef301506h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Technology and Support Centre, Straubing, Germany
  2. Virtual Institute of Complex Molecular Systems in Environmental Health (HICE)
  3. Federal Ministry of Science and Culture, Lower Saxony, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The impact of combustion conditions on emission factors and characteristics of log wood combustion was investigated. Two different kinds of log woods (spruce and beech) and one kind of briquette (spruce sawdust) were used to study differences in emission behavior depending upon the wood type. Beech wood was used to examine additionally the impact of different moisture contents and maloperation on emissions of fine particulate matter (PM). Therefore, wood logs with three different levels of moisture content were used. Maloperation was simulated by an overload scenario and an air deficiency scenario. Toxicity equivalent (TEQ) values were calculated for the different combustion conditions. It was found that PM mass varies only by a factor of 8 at a maximum, whereas TEQ values can vary more than a factor of 80 (regular beech wood combustion, 6 mu g MJ(-1); beech wood combustion in an overloaded combustion chamber, 500 mu g MJ(-1)). In particular, wood with a higher moisture content (19%) released high amounts of intermediate products from lignin and cellulose degradation. The PM emissions in this case were the highest among the tested operation conditions, especially during the initial (cold start) inflaming (660 mu g MJ(-1)), but were not in correspondence with the toxicity potential. The TEQ(37 mu g MJ(-1)) in that case was much lower than during maloperation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available