4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Enhanced NOx Reduction by Combined Staged Air and Flue Gas Recirculation in Biomass Grate Combustion

Journal

ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 3003-3011

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ef300199g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. KRAV
  2. SINTEF Energy Research
  3. Research Council of Norway

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flue gas recirculation (FGR) is a conventional means of reducing NOx emissions that involves lowering the peak flame temperature and reducing the oxygen concentration in the combustion region. Staged air combustion is also an effective means of NOx reduction, especially in biomass combustion. This article reports results on NOx emissions in a set of experiments combining FGR and staged air combustion in a grate-fired laboratory-scale reactor. Two different compositions of the recirculated flue gas were used: CO2 and CO2 + NO. The CO2 concentration varied between 0-8 vol % of the total inlet flow rate and the NO concentration varied between 0 and 64 ppm. Two different FGR locations were also tested: above and below the grate. The results are compared with a reference experiment performed without FGR The NOx reduction level from staged air combustion at the optimal primary excess air ratio is similar to 70%, while employing FGR can reduce the NOx emissions by an additional 5%-10%. The optimal primary excess air ratio range is 0.9-1. However, FGR more effectively reduces NOx when employed outside of the optimum primary excess air ratio range, i.e., excess air ratios higher than 1 and less than 0.9. The experiments with FGR located above the grate exhibit higher reduction potential, while FGR located below the grate produces decreased reduction. The recycled-NO conversion factor, which gives a measure of maximal FGR efficiency, at the maximum point, is nearly 100% when FGR is applied below the grate and is 85%-100% in the case of recirculation above the grate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available