4.8 Review

An assessment of strategies for the development of solid-state adsorbents for vehicular hydrogen storage

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages 2784-2812

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ee01085d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) [DE-NA-0003525]
  2. Hydrogen MaterialsAdvanced Research Consortium (HyMARC) as part of the Energy Materials Network under the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Fuel Cell Technologies Office [DE-AC04-94AL85000, DE-AC36-08-GO28308, DE-AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  3. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
  4. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC05-76RL01830]
  6. Office of Science of U. S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  7. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy [DE-EE0007046, DE-EE0008093]
  8. U.S. National Science Foundation [1531752]
  9. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE)
  10. DOE [DE-AC05-06OR23100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanoporous adsorbents are a diverse category of solid-state materials that hold considerable promise for vehicular hydrogen storage. Although impressive storage capacities have been demonstrated for several materials, particularly at cryogenic temperatures, materials meeting all of the targets established by the U.S. Department of Energy have yet to be identified. In this Perspective, we provide an overview of the major known and proposed strategies for hydrogen adsorbents, with the aim of guiding ongoing research as well as future new storage concepts. The discussion of each strategy includes current relevant literature, strengths and weaknesses, and outstanding challenges that preclude implementation. We consider in particular metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), including surface area/volume tailoring, open metal sites, and the binding of multiple H-2 molecules to a single metal site. Two related classes of porous framework materials, covalent organic frameworks (COFs) and porous aromatic frameworks (PAFs), are also discussed, as are graphene and graphene oxide and doped porous carbons. We additionally introduce criteria for evaluating the merits of a particular materials design strategy. Computation has become an important tool in the discovery of new storage materials, and a brief introduction to the benefits and limitations of computational predictions of H-2 physisorption is therefore presented. Finally, considerations for the synthesis and characterization of hydrogen storage adsorbents are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available