4.8 Article

A perspective on the high-voltage LiMn1.5Ni0.5O4 spinel cathode for lithium-ion batteries

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 1339-1350

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ee42981d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Vehicle Technologies of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. Welch Foundation [F-1254]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The LiMn1.5Ni0.5O4 spinel is an attractive cathode candidate for next generation lithium-ion batteries as it offers high power capability with an operating voltage of similar to 4.7 V and a capacity of similar to 135 mA h g(-1). However, its commercialization is plagued by severe capacity fade, particularly at elevated temperatures, in full cells employing a graphite anode. This perspective article provides an overview of the recent developments on understanding various factors that influence the electrochemical performance of the high-voltage spinel cathodes. The factors include the degree of cation ordering, Mn3+ content, morphology, and surface planes/compositions in contact with the electrolyte, which are influenced by synthesis and annealing conditions as well as cation doping. For example, samples with a {111} family of surface planes show superior performance. Recent magnetic measurements and examination of discharge profiles below 3 V have become valuable to get a more precise measure of the degree of cation ordering. Also, surface modifications and electrolyte additives have shown marginal gains. Although acceptable performances have been obtained in half-cells with a metallic lithium anode, capacity fade is seen in full cells with a graphite anode due to metal dissolution at the high operating voltage of 4.7 V and Li+ consumption by the steadily forming solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer promoted by Mn/Ni deposition on the graphite surface. Based on the current understanding, future directions are pointed out.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available