4.8 Article

Functional links between Pt single crystal morphology and nanoparticles with different size and shape: the oxygen reduction reaction case

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages 4061-4069

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ee01564a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division
  2. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory by UChicago Argonne, LLC [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  3. Scientific User Facilities Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Design of active and stable Pt-based nanoscale electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) will be the key to improving the efficiency of fuel cells that are needed to deliver reliable, affordable and environmentally friendly energy. Here, by exploring the ORR on Pt single crystals, cubo-octahedral (polyhedral) Pt NPs with different sizes (ranging from 2 to 7 nm), and 7-8 nm Pt NPs with different shapes (cubo-octahedral vs. cube vs. octahedral), we presented a surface science approach capable of rationalizing, and ultimately understanding, fundamental relationships between stability of Pt NPs and activity of the ORR in acidic media. By exploring the potential induced dissolution/ re-deposition of Pt between 0.05 and 1.3 V, we found that concomitant variations in morphology of Pt(111) and Pt(100) lead to narrowing differences in activity between Pt single crystal surfaces. We also found that regardless of an initial size or shape, NPs are metastable and easily evolve to thermodynamically equilibrated shape and size with very similar activity for the ORR. We concluded that while initially clearly observed, the particle size and shape effects diminish as the particles age to the point that it may appear that the ORR depends neither on the particle size nor particle shape.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available