4.8 Article

Oxide enthalpy of formation and band gap energy as accurate descriptors of oxygen vacancy formation energetics

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages 1996-2004

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ee43874k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) through the Renewable Energy Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (REMRSEC) [DMR-0820518]
  2. Department of Energy Office of Science Graduate Fellowship Program (DOE SCGF)
  3. ORISE-ORAU [DE-AC05-06OR23100]
  4. National Science Foundation [DMR-1309980]
  5. NSF [CNS-0821794]
  6. University of Colorado Boulder
  7. Division Of Materials Research
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1309980] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the fundamental role oxygen vacancy formation energies play in a broad range of important energy applications, their relationships with the intrinsic bulk properties of solid oxides remain elusive. Our study of oxygen vacancy formation in La1-xSrxBO3 perovskites (B=Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, and Ni) conducted using modern, electronic structure theory and solid-state defect models demonstrates that a combination of two fundamental and intrinsic materials properties, the oxide enthalpy of formation and the minimum band gap energy, accurately correlate with oxygen vacancy formation energies. The energy to form a single, neutral oxygen vacancy decreases with both the oxide enthalpy of formation and the band gap energy in agreement with the relation of the former to metal-oxygen bond strengths and of the latter to the energy of the oxygen vacancy electron density redistribution. These findings extend our understanding of the nature of oxygen vacancy formation in complex oxides and provide a fundamental method for predicting oxygen vacancy formation energies using purely intrinsic bulk properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available