4.8 Article

Crystalline silicon photovoltaics: a cost analysis framework for determining technology pathways to reach baseload electricity costs

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 5874-5883

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2ee03489a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG36-09GO19001, DE-EE0005314]
  2. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1102050]
  3. MIT Desphande Center for Technical Innovation
  4. MIT-KFUPM Center for Clean Water and Energy
  5. Department of Defense through NDSEG
  6. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  7. Directorate For Engineering [1102050] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Crystalline silicon (c-Si) photovoltaics are robust, manufacturable, and Earth-abundant. However, barriers exist for c-Si modules to reach US$0.50-0.75/W-p fabrication costs necessary for subsidy-free utility-scale adoption. We evaluate the potential of c-Si photovoltaics to reach this goal by developing a bottom-up cost model for c-Si wafer, cell, and module manufacturing; performing a sensitivity analysis to determine research domains that provide the greatest impact on cost; and evaluating the cost-reduction potential of line-of-sight manufacturing innovation and scale, as well as advanced technology innovation. We identify research domains with large cost reduction potential, including improving efficiencies, improving silicon utilization, and streamlining manufacturing processes and equipment, and briefly review ongoing research and development activities that impact these research domains. We conclude that multiple technology pathways exist to enable US$0.50/W-p module manufacturing in the United States with silicon absorbers. More broadly, this work presents a user-targeted research and development framework that prioritizes research needs based on market impact.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available