4.8 Article

Facile synthesis of Li4Ti5O12/C composite with super rate performance

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 5, Issue 11, Pages 9595-9602

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2ee22591c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51072131, 51202121, 51232005]
  2. Key Project for Basic Research for three main areas of Shenzhen [JC201104210152A]
  3. Guangdong Province Innovation R&D Team Plan for Energy and Environmental Materials [2009010025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Li4Ti5O12/C composite with lump morphology and excellent rate performance are synthesized using a facile hydrothermal method followed by a low temperature heat treatment. In the hydrothermal process, the introduction of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) as a surfactant significantly improves the rate performance of Li4Ti5O12/C composite as anode material for lithium ion battery (LIB). The specific capacities of the obtained composite at charge and discharge rates of 0.1, 1, 5, 10 and 20 C are 176, 163, 156, 151 and 136 mA h g(-1), respectively, which is apparently larger than those of the Li4Ti5O12/C free from CTAB in the preparation. The Li4Ti5O12/C prepared in presence of CTAB also shows excellent cycling performance at high rate, which is attributed to its larger diffusion coefficient of lithium ion (6.82 x 10(-12) cm(2) s(-1)) and smaller charge-transfer resistance (R-ct) (19.2 Omega) than those of the composite (1.22 x 10(-13) cm(2) s(-1) and 50.2 Omega) free from CTAB in the preparation. The Li4Ti5O12 particles obtained in presence of CTAB are coated uniformly by a thin carbon layer with a thickness of similar to 1 nm, whereas the Li4Ti5O12 particles obtained in absence of CTAB are covered by relatively thick surface layers with a thickness of similar to 2.5 nm, which is too thick, blocks the lithium ion diffusion and leads to low ionic conductivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available