4.8 Article

Resistance and polarization losses in aqueous buffer-membrane electrolytes for water-splitting photoelectrochemical cells

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 7582-7589

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2ee03422k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Energy Biosciences, U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-07ER15911]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-07ER15911] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recent development of inexpensive catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction has suggested that efficient photoelectrochemical cells (PECs) might be constructed from terrestrially abundant materials. Because these catalysts operate in aqueous buffer solutions at neutral to slightly basic pH, it is important to consider whether electrolytic cells can have low series loss under these conditions. Water-splitting or fuel-forming PECs will likely require porous separators or electrolyte membranes to separate the cathode products from oxygen produced at the anode. For this reason we analyze the individual potential losses in electrolytic systems of buffer solutions and commercially available anion-and cation-exchange membranes. Potentiometric analysis and pH measurements were employed to measure the potential losses associated with solution resistance, membrane resistance, and pH gradient formation at the current density (25 mA cm(-2)) expected for efficient PECs. The membrane pH gradient is the most problematic source of loss in these systems, but monoprotic buffers can minimize the pH gradient by diffusion of the neutral acidic or basic form of the buffer across the membrane. These results suggest that water-splitting PECs can be viable with properly chosen membrane-buffer combinations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available