4.8 Article

Feasibility of zeolitic imidazolate framework membranes for clean energy applications

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 7637-7646

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2ee21743k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CSIRO via Office of Chief Executive schemes
  2. Advanced Materials and Computational and Simulation Sciences Platforms
  3. Advanced Scientific Computing Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gas separation technologies for carbon-free hydrogen and clean gaseous fuel production must efficiently perform the following separations: (1) H-2/CO2 (and H-2/N-2) for pre-combustion coal gasification, (2) CO2/N-2 for post-combustion of coal, (3) CO2/CH4 for natural gas sweetening and biofuel purification, and (4) O-2/N-2 for oxy-combustion of coal. By utilizing a molecular simulation approach, Monte Carlo procedures, free volume analysis, and continuum modeling, we predict the intrinsic gas permeability and separation properties of several new Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks (ZIFs), a family of the Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs). The well defined pore sizes in conjunction with high surface areas make ZIFs prime candidates for molecular sieving. In this work, our calculated intrinsic properties are compared with current experimental results where ZIFs are either grown in dense layers to form pure inorganic membranes on porous supports or dispersed within a polymer phase to form mixed matrix membranes. Consequently, this paper assesses current membrane development according to industrial feasibility targets and highlights the achievable superior separation results for ideal membrane configurations. For example, ZIF-11 is discovered to be capable of sieving H-2 from all of its larger gas counterparts at a remarkable H-2/CO2 selectivity of 262 and H-2 permeability of 5830 Barrer, well within the target area for efficient hydrogen production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available