4.8 Article

Soft X-ray XANES studies of various phases related to LiFePO4 based cathode materials

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages 7007-7016

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2ee03445j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canada Research Chair (CRC) Program
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  4. Ontario Innovation Trust (OIT)
  5. Ontario Research Fund (ORF)
  6. Ontario Early Researcher Award (ERA)
  7. University of Western Ontario
  8. NRC
  9. NSERC
  10. CIHR
  11. University of Saskatchewan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

LiFePO4 has been a promising cathode material for rechargeable lithium ion batteries. Different secondary or impurity phases, forming during either synthesis or subsequent redox process under normal operating conditions, can have a significant impact on the performance of the electrode. The exploration of the electronic and chemical structures of impurity phases is crucial to understand such influence. We have embarked on a series of synchrotron-based X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy studies for the element speciation in various impurity phase materials relevant to LiFePO4 for Li ion batteries. In the present report, soft-X-ray XANES spectra of Li K-edge, P L-2,L-3-edge, O K-edge and Fe L-2,L-3-edge have been obtained for LiFePO4 in crystalline, disordered and amorphous forms and some possible impurities'', including LiPO3, Li4P2O7, Li3PO4, Fe-3(PO4)(2), FePO4, and Fe2O3. The results indicate that each element from different pure reference compounds exhibits unique spectral features in terms of energy position, shape and intensity of the resonances in its XANES. In addition, inverse partial fluorescence yield (IPFY) reveals the surface vs. bulk property of the specimens. Therefore, the spectral data provided here can be used as standards in the future for phase composition analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available