4.7 Article

Experimental and simulation study of a free piston expander linear generator for small-scale organic Rankine cycle

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 161, Issue -, Pages 776-791

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.171

Keywords

Waste heat recovery; Organic Rankine cycle; Free piston expander-linear generator; Motion characteristics; Output performance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51575056, 51776005, 51376011]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation Program [3152005]
  3. Project of Sixteenth Scientific Research Foundation for Graduate Students in Beijing University of Technology [ykj-2017-00024, ykj-2017-00018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a new free piston expander linear generator (FPE-LG) for small-scale organic Rankine cycle (ORC) waste heat recovery systems. An FPE-LG experimental test rig is developed, and a simulation model is established with Matlab/Simulink. Motion characteristics and output performance are discussed based on experimental results, and the simulation model is validated. Further investigation of the motion characteristics and output performance of FPE-LG is conducted at a relatively high intake pressure and operating frequency. Results show that intake pressure and operating frequency significantly affect motion characteristics and output performance. The velocity and displacement of the free piston assembly increase with increasing intake pressure, and the peak power output initially increases then decreases with increasing operating frequency. The peak power output is 676 W when the intake pressure, external load resistance, and operating frequency are 10 bar, 90, and 15 Hz, respectively. Using the simulation model to study FPE-LG operating parameters is convenient, and the model can serve as a reference for the future design and optimization of FPE-LG. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available