4.7 Article

Laboratory assessment of residential building walls containing pipe-encapsulated phase change materials for thermal management

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 163, Issue -, Pages 383-391

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.159

Keywords

Phase change materials (PCM); Thermal energy storage; Wall heat transfer; Building envelope

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [0533362]
  2. National Natural and Science Foundation (China) [51308051]
  3. California Energy Commission [EISG Grant] [03-25]
  4. Hunan Association for Science and Technology [2017TJQ05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To reduce the heat flow between building interior and exterior environments using thermal energy storage without causing problems related to moisture transfer, this paper presents residential building walls enhanced with pipe-encapsulated phase change materials (PCM). Experimental investigations are conducted to identify thermal performance of building walls with pipe-encapsulated PCM in typical summer conditions. A dynamic wall simulator was designed and built to reproduce residential building indoor and outdoor conditions in a laboratory setting. Two pipe sizes, based on diameter, installed in a horizontal arrangement and placed at various wall depths were investigated. The heat transfer through building walls with pipe-encapsulated PCM was evaluated based on peak heat flux reductions and peak heat flux time shift. The peak heat fluxes of the PCM-outfitted walls were reduced by a maximum of 22.5% for what was referred to as next to wallboard configuration and 36.5% for middle depth configuration, respectively, compared to standard walls. The corresponding daily energy savings were 27.4 W-hr/m(2) and 51.2 W-hr/m(2). PCM encapsulated in smaller pipes installed in the middle depth of the wall cavity is recommended to realize complete solidification and melting for larger peak flux reduction and energy savings. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available