4.7 Article

Exergy analysis and parametric optimization of three power and fresh water cogeneration systems using refrigeration chillers

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 59, Issue -, Pages 340-355

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.07.040

Keywords

Cogeneration; Exergy; GT (gas turbine); Optimization; RO (reverse osmosis)

Funding

  1. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF)
  2. Korean government (MEST) [KRF-2012-001400]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  4. Korea government (MSIP) [2008-0061908]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three power and fresh water cogeneration systems that combine a GT (gas turbine) power plant and a RO (reverse osmosis) desalination system were compared based on the exergy viewpoint. In the first system, the GT and RO systems were coupled mechanically to form a base system. In the second and third systems, a VCR (vapor-compression refrigeration) cycle and a single-effect AC(Water-LiBr) (water/lithium bromide absorption chiller) were used, respectively, to cool the compressor inlet air and preheat the RO intake seawater via waste heat recovery in the VCR condenser and AC(Water-LiBr) absorber. A parametric analysis-based exergy was conducted to evaluate the effects of the key thermodynamic parameters including the compressor inlet air temperature and the fuel-mass flow rate on the system exergy efficiency. Parameter optimization was achieved using a GA (genetic algorithm) to reach the maximum exergy efficiency, where the thermodynamic improvement potentials of the systems were identified. The optimum values of performance for the three cogeneration systems were compared under the same conditions. The results showed that the cogeneration system with the AC is the best system among the three systems, since it can increase exergy and energy efficiencies as well as net power generation by 3.79%, 4.21%, and 38%, respectively, compared to the base system. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available