4.7 Article

Evaluation of cost reduction potential for a coal based polygeneration system with CO2 capture

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages 101-106

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.11.059

Keywords

Learning curve; Polygeneration; CO2 capture; Localization; IGCC; Methanol

Funding

  1. China 863 project [2011AA050606]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The coal based polygeneration with CO2 capture (PG + CC) technology is expected as one of the possible options to mitigate CO2 emissions with low cost and low energy. This work assesses the cost reduction potential of PG + CC technology based on learning curve method, and finds out what factors and how they influence the cost curve. Results show that the unit investment of PG + CC can decrease to around 600-900$/kW from current 1500$/kW by means of capacity increment, technology further localization and plant efficiency upgrade. Localization and plant efficiency upgrade will play an important role in PG + CC cost reduction. 45%similar to 55% of the unit investment reduction originates from the capacity increment, 20%similar to 35% from technology localization, and 10%similar to 20% from plant efficiency upgrade. Compared with IGCC technology with CO2 capture (IGCC + CC), the unit investment of PG + CC is 25%similar to 30% lower. Compared with coal-pulverized supercritical plant with CO2 capture (PC + CC), in short term PG + CC is less economically competitive; In medium term, when the total installed capacity reaches several to ten GWs, the unit investment of PG + CC technology can compete with that of PC + CC and will be lower afterwards; In long term, the PG + CC technology will be more economically competitive than PC + CC. Moreover, PG + CC is more energy efficient than the other two technologies. The results indicate that the coal based PG + CC is more acceptable for China and may act as a significant part in CO2 capture technologies. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available