4.5 Article

Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on the Wiener Process with Measurement Error

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 520-547

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en7020520

Keywords

lithium-ion batteries; remaining useful life; the Wiener process; measurement error; prediction; truncated normal distribution; maximum likelihood estimation; Bayesian; expectation maximization algorithm

Categories

Funding

  1. Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61272428, 41174162, 61174030, 61104223, 61374126]
  2. Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [20120002110067]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Remaining useful life (RUL) prediction is central to the prognostics and health management (PHM) of lithium-ion batteries. This paper proposes a novel RUL prediction method for lithium-ion batteries based on the Wiener process with measurement error (WPME). First, we use the truncated normal distribution (TND) based modeling approach for the estimated degradation state and obtain an exact and closed-form RUL distribution by simultaneously considering the measurement uncertainty and the distribution of the estimated drift parameter. Then, the traditional maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) method for population based parameters estimation is remedied to improve the estimation efficiency. Additionally, we analyze the relationship between the classic MLE method and the combination of the Bayesian updating algorithm and the expectation maximization algorithm for the real time RUL prediction. Interestingly, it is found that the result of the combination algorithm is equal to the classic MLE method. Inspired by this observation, a heuristic algorithm for the real time parameters updating is presented. Finally, numerical examples and a case study of lithium-ion batteries are provided to substantiate the superiority of the proposed RUL prediction method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available