4.5 Article

Online Estimation of Peak Power Capability of Li-Ion Batteries in Electric Vehicles by a Hardware-in-Loop Approach

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages 1455-1469

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en5051455

Keywords

electrochemical-polarization model; peak power capability; lithium-ion battery; hybrid electric vehicles; hardware-in-loop

Categories

Funding

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2011AA112304, 2011AA11A228, 2011AA1290]
  2. Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology [2010DFB70090]
  3. Beijing Institute of Technology Post Graduate Students Innovation Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Battery peak power capability estimations play an important theoretical role for the proper use of the battery in electric vehicles. To address the failures in relaxation effects and real-time ability performance, neglecting the battery's design limits and other issues of the traditional peak power capability calculation methods, a new approach based on the dynamic electrochemical-polarization (EP) battery model, taking into consideration constraints of current, voltage, state of charge (SoC) and power is proposed. A hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) system is built for validating the online model-based peak power capability estimation approach of batteries used in hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and a HIL test based on the Federal Urban Driving Schedules (FUDS) is used to verify and evaluate its real-time computation performance, reliability and robustness. The results show the proposed approach gives a more accurate estimate compared with the hybrid pulse power characterization (HPPC) method, avoiding over-charging or over-discharging and providing a powerful guarantee for the optimization of HEVs power systems. Furthermore, the HIL test provides valuable data and critical guidance to evaluate the accuracy of the developed battery algorithms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available