4.6 Article

Evaluation of an endoscopic suturing device for transoral outlet reduction in patients with weight regain following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Journal

ENDOSCOPY
Volume 45, Issue 7, Pages 532-536

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326638

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Olympus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and study aims: A dilated gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA) is thought to be associated with weight regain in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Due to a high rate of perioperative morbidity, surgical revision is not generally performed. The aim of this study was to assess the technical feasibility, safety, and early outcomes of a procedure using a commercially available endoscopic suturing device to reduce the diameter of the GJA. Patients and methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 25 consecutive patients who underwent transoral outlet reduction (TORe) for dilated GJA and weight regain. An endoscopic suturing device was used to place sutures at the margin of the GJA in order to reduce its aperture. On chart review, clinical data were available at 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: Patients had regained a mean of 24kg from their weight loss nadir and had a mean body mass index of 43kg/m(2) at the time of endoscopic revision. Average anastomosis diameter was 26.4mm. Technical success was achieved in all patients (100%) with a mean reduction in anastomosis diameter to 6mm (range 3-10mm), representing a 77.3% reduction. The mean weight loss in successful cases was 11.5 kg, 11.7 kg, and 10.8kg at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. There were no major complications. Conclusion: This case series demonstrated the technical feasibility, safety, and efficacy of performing gastrojejunostomy reduction using a commercially available endoscopic suturing device. This technique may represent an effective and minimally invasive option for the management of weight regain in patients with RYGB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available