4.6 Article

Preoperative routine evaluation of bilateral adrenal glands by endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration in patients with potentially resectable lung cancer

Journal

ENDOSCOPY
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages 195-201

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325988

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and study aims: The aim of the current study was to assess the detection rate of the right adrenal gland and the diagnostic ability of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for the diagnosis of adrenal metastasis in potentially resectable lung cancer. Patients and methods: This retrospective cohort study included a consecutive series of 150 patients undergoing EUS/EUS-FNA for staging of lung cancer. The detection rate of the right adrenal gland by EUS and the diagnostic accuracies of computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT), and EUS/EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of adrenal metastasis were evaluated. Results: The right adrenal gland was visualized by EUS in 131 patients (87.3%); the left adrenal gland was visualized in all patients. Findings suggestive of metastasis in either one of the adrenal glands or in both were observed in 6 patients (4.0%) by CT, in 5 patients (3.3%) by PET-CT, and in 11 patients (7.3%) by EUS. EUS-FNA was performed simultaneously in the 11 patients, and in 4 patients the diagnosis of metastasis was established. The accuracy for the diagnosis of adrenal metastasis was 100% for EUS/EUS-FNA, 96.0% for CT, and 97.0% for PET-CT (P=0.1146). Conclusions: As well as the left adrenal gland, the right adrenal gland was also usually visible by EUS. EUS/EUS-FNA provided an accurate diagnosis of adrenal metastasis, although the prevalence of adrenal metastasis was relatively low in these patients with potentially resectable lung cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available