4.5 Article

Proinsulin Binds with High Affinity the Insulin Receptor Isoform A and Predominantly Activates the Mitogenic Pathway

Journal

ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 153, Issue 5, Pages 2152-2163

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2011-1843

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) [10625]
  2. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Calabria e Lucania
  3. PRIN-MIUR [2008BKRFBH_005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proinsulin is generally regarded as an inactive prohormone because of its low metabolic activity. However, proinsulin appears to regulate embryo development in animal models. In this study, we evaluated whether proinsulin may differentially bind to and activate the two insulin receptor (IR) isoforms (IR-A and IR-B), because IR-A is a relatively low-specificity receptor that is prevalent in fetal and cancer cells and is able to mediate the growth effects of IGF-II. Mouse R- fibroblasts devoid of IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) and stably transfected with cDNA encoding either human IR-A or IR-B (R- /IR-A and R- /IR-B cells) were used. Three human cancer cell lines were also studied. We found that proinsulin stimulated phosphorylation of IR-A with an EC50 of 4.5 +/- 0.6 nM and displaced [I-125] insulin from IR-A with a similar EC50. In contrast, proinsulin EC50 values for stimulation of IR-B phosphorylation and for [I-125] insulin displacement from IR-B were approximately 7-foldhigher. Proinsulin did not bind or activate IGF-IR or IR/IGF-IR hybrids. Via IR-A, proinsulin activated the ERK/p70S6K pathway to a similar degree as insulin but elicited a weaker Akt response. Despite its low metabolic activity, proinsulin was almost equipotent as insulin in inducing cell proliferation and migration in cells expressing various IR-A levels. In conclusion, proinsulin is a selective IR-A ligand and may induce biological effects through this IR isoform. (Endocrinology 153: 2152-2163, 2012)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available