4.5 Article

Impairment of Peripheral Circadian Clocks Precedes Metabolic Abnormalities in ob/ob Mice

Journal

ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 152, Issue 4, Pages 1347-1354

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2010-1068

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan [21790880]
  2. Takeda Science Foundation
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21790880] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have demonstrated relationships between the dysfunction of circadian clocks and the development of metabolic abnormalities, but the chicken-and-egg question remains unresolved. To address this issue, we investigated the cause-effect relationship in obese, diabetic ob/ob mice. Compared with control C57BL/6J mice, the daily mRNA expression profiles of the clock and clock-controlled genes Clock, Bmal1, Cry1, Per1, Per2, and Dbp were substantially dampened in the liver and adipose tissue, but not the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus, of 10-wk-old ob/ob mice. Four-week feeding of a low-calorie diet and administration of leptin over a 7-d period attenuated, to a significant and comparable extent, the observed metabolic abnormalities (obesity, hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and hypercholesterolemia) in the ob/ob mice. However, only leptin treatment improved the impaired peripheral clocks. In addition, clock function, assessed by measuringlevels of Per1, Per2, and Dbp mRNA at around peaktimes, was also reduced in the peripheral tissues of 3-wk-old ob/ob mice without any overt metabolic abnormalities. Collectively these results indicate that the impairment of peripheral clocks in ob/ob mice does not result from metabolic abnormalities but may instead be at least partially caused by leptin deficiency itself. Further studies are needed to clarify how leptin deficiency affects peripheral clocks. (Endocrinology 152: 1347-1354, 2011)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available