4.5 Article

Pioglitazone Inhibits Toll-Like Receptor Expression and Activity in Human Monocytes and db/db Mice

Journal

ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 150, Issue 8, Pages 3457-3464

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2008-1757

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. American Diabetes Association [7-07-JF-16]
  2. National Institutes of Health [K24 AT00596, JDRF-1-2007-585]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are key innate immune sensors of endogenous damage signals and play an important role in inflammatory diseases like diabetes and atherosclerosis. Pioglitazone (PIO), a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma agonist, has been reported to be an antiinflammatory agent. Thus, in the present study, we examined the antiinflammatory effects of PIO on TLR2 and TLR4 expression in human monocytes exposed to Pam3CSK4 (Pam; TLR2 ligand) and purified lipopolysaccharide (LPS; TLR4 ligand) using flow cytometry and real-time RT-PCR. Monocytes were isolated from healthy human volunteers and pretreated with PIO (1 mu M) followed by Pam (170 ng/ml) and LPS (160 ng/ml) challenge. PIO significantly decreased Pam- and LPS-induced TLR2 (-56%) and TLR4 (-78%) expression (P < 0.05). In addition, PIO decreased TLR ligand-induced nuclear factor-kappa B activity (-63%), IL-1 beta (-50%), IL-6 (-52%), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1(-83%), and TNF-alpha (-87%) compared with control. Next, PIO-treated db/db mice (n=6/ group) showed decreased TLR2 (-60%) and TLR4 (-45%) expression in peritoneal macrophages compared with vehicle control mice (P < 0.001) with associated decrease in MyD88-dependent signaling and nuclear factor-kappa B activation. Data suggest that Pam- and LPS-induced TLR2 and TLR4 expression are inhibited by PIO in human monocytes and db/db mice. Thus, we define a novel pathway by which PIO could induce antiinflammatory effects. (Endocrinology 150: 3457-3464, 2009)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available