4.5 Article

Low doses of insulin-like growth factor I improve insulin resistance, lipid metabolism, and oxidative damage in aging rats

Journal

ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 149, Issue 5, Pages 2433-2442

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2007-1190

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

GH and IGF-I concentrations decline with age. Age-related changes appear to be linked to decreases in the anabolic hormones, GH and IGF-I. The aim of this study was to investigate the antioxidant, anabolic, and metabolic effects of the IGF-I replacement therapy, at low doses, in aging rats. Three experimental groups were included in this protocol: young healthy controls (17 wk old); untreated old (O) rats (103 wk old); and aging rats (103 wk old) treated with IGF-I during 1 month (2.25 mu g IGF-I/100 g body weight(-1).d(-1)). Compared with young controls, untreated aging rats showed a reduction of IGF-I and testosterone levels, and a decrease of serum total antioxidant status, which were corrected by IGF-I therapy. In addition, untreated O presented increased levels of serum glucose with hyperinsulinemia, cholesterol, and triglycerides, and a reduction of free fatty acid concentrations. IGF-I therapy was able to revert insulin resistance, and to reduce cholesterol and triglycerides levels increasing significantly free fatty acid concentrations. The O group showed higher oxidative damage in brain and liver tissues associated with alterations in antioxidant enzyme activities. IGF-I therapy reduced oxidative damage in brain and liver, normalizing antioxidant enzyme activities and mitochondrial dysfunction. In conclusion, low doses of IGF-I restore circulating IGF-I, improve glucose and lipid metabolism, increase testosterone levels and serum total antioxidant capability, and reduce oxidative damage in brain and liver associated with a normalization of antioxidant enzyme activities and mitochondrial function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available