4.4 Article

Is BRAFV600E mutation a marker for central nodal metastasis in small papillary thyroid carcinoma?

Journal

ENDOCRINE-RELATED CANCER
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 285-295

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/ERC-13-0291

Keywords

papillary thyroid carcinoma; BRAF mutation; central neck dissection; recurrent laryngeal nerve; hypoparathyroidism

Funding

  1. Korean Foundation for Cancer Research [CB-2011-03-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Utilizing BRAF(V600E) mutation as a marker may reduce unnecessary prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) in clinically nodal negative (cN0) neck for small <= 2 cm) classical papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). We aimed to assess whether BRAF is a significant independent predictor of occult central nodal metastasis (CNM) and its contribution to the overall prediction after adjusting for other significant preoperative clinical factors in small PTC. Primary tumor tissue (paraffin-embedded) from 845 patients with small classical cN0 PTC who underwent pCND was tested for BRAF mutation. Clinicopathologic factors were compared between those with and without BRAF. BRAF was evaluated to see if it was an independent factor for CNM. Prediction scores were generated using logistic regression models and their predictability was measured by the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The prevalence of BRAF was 628/845 (74.3%) while the rate of CNM was 285/845 (33.7%). Male sex (odds ratio (OR): 2.68, 95% CI: 1.71-4.20), large tumor size (OR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.80-4.00), multifocality (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.07-2.09), lymphovascular permeation (OR: 10.40, 95% CI: 5.18-20.88), and BRAF (OR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.10-2.46) were significant independent predictors of CNM, while coexisting Hashimoto's thyroiditis (OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.40-0.80) was an independent protective factor. The AUC for prediction score based on tumor size and male sex was similar to that of prediction score based on tumor size, male sex, and BRAF status (0.68 vs 0.69, P=0.60). Although BRAF was an independent predictor of CNM, knowing its status did not substantially improve the overall prediction. A simpler prediction score based on male sex and tumor size might be sufficient.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available