4.2 Article

Administration of highly purified eicosapentaenoic acid to statin-treated diabetic patients further improves vascular function

Journal

ENDOCRINE JOURNAL
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages 297-304

Publisher

JAPAN ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ11-0394

Keywords

Eicosapentaenoic acid; Vascular function; Diabetes mellitus; Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Residual risk

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We prospectively examined the additional effects of highly purified eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) particularly on the vascular function of diabetic patients with hypercholesterolemia receiving statin therapy. We enrolled 28 patients with type 2 diabetes complicated by dyslipidemia who had been treated with statins for at least one year. The patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups: administration of statin alone (group S: n=13) and addition of EPA to the current statin therapy (group SE: n=15). The highly purified EPA was administered at a dose of 1,800 mg/day for 6 months. To evaluate vascular function, the duration of reactive hyperemia (DRH), which is the time required for forearm blood flow to return to the basal level after inducing reactive hyperemia, was measured using strain gauge plethysmography. There were no significant differences in the clinical background factors between the 2 groups. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels significantly decreased after 6 months only in group SE. Compared with the baseline data, no significant change in DRE was observed after 6 months in group S. By contrast, DRE was significantly prolonged after 6 months in group SE, indicating that the addition of highly purified EPA improved vascular function. Our results showed that in patients with type 2 diabetes and receiving statin therapy whose LDL-C level was less than 100 mg/dL, the addition of highly purified EPA for 6 months significantly improved vascular function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available