4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Contribution to the Themed Section: Advances in Plankton Modelling and Biodiversity Evaluation REVIEW The role of phytoplankton diversity in the emergent oceanic stoichiometry

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages 1021-1035

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbv087

Keywords

stoichiometry; trait-based models; redfield; phytoplankton

Funding

  1. Directorate For Geosciences [1211972] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  2. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  3. Directorate For Geosciences [0928819] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Marine phytoplankton are a taxonomically and functionally diverse group of organisms that are key players in the most important biogeochemical cycles. Phytoplankton taxa show different resource utilization strategies (e.g. nutrient-uptake rates and cellular allocation) and traits. Therefore, acknowledging this diversity is crucial to understanding how elemental cycles operate, including the origin and dynamics of elemental ratios. In this paper, we focus on trait-based models as tools to study the role of phytoplankton diversity in the stoichiometric phenomenology observed in the laboratory and in the open ocean. We offer a compilation of known empirical results on stoichiometry and summarize how trait-based approaches have attempted to replicate these results. By contrasting the different ecological and evolutionary approaches available in the literature, we explore the strengths and limitations of the existing models. We thus try to identify existing gaps and challenges, and point to potential new directions that can be explored to fill these gaps. We aim to highlight the potential of including diversity explicitly in our modeling approaches, which can help us gain important knowledge about changes in local and global stoichiometric patterns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available