4.3 Article

Net biogenic silica production and the contribution of diatoms to new production and organic matter export in the Costa Rica Dome ecosystem

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages 216-229

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbv077

Keywords

diatom; biogenic silica production; vertical flux; new production

Funding

  1. United States National Science Foundation [OCE-0826626]
  2. Directorate For Geosciences [1155663] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1155663] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We determined the net rate of biogenic silica (bSiO(2)) production and estimated the diatom contribution to new production and organic matter export in the Costa Rica Dome during summer 2010. The shallow thermocline significantly reduces bSiO(2) dissolution rates below the mixed layer, leading to significant enhancement of bSiO(2) relative to organic matter (silicate-pump condition). This may explain why deep export of bSiO(2) in this region is elevated by an order of magnitude relative to comparable systems. Diatom carbon, relative to autotrophic carbon, was low (<3%); however, the contribution of diatoms to new production averaged 3 and 13% using independent approaches. The 4-old discrepancy between methods may be explained by a low average C:Si ratio (similar to 1.4) for the net produced diatom C relative to the net produced bSiO(2). We speculate that this low production ratio is not the result of reduced C, but may arise from a significant contribution of non-diatom silicifying organisms to bSiO(2) production. The contribution of diatoms to organic matter export was minor (5.7%). These results, and those of the broader project, suggest substantial food-web transformation of diatom organic matter in the euphotic zone, which creates enriched bSiO(2) relative to organic matter within the exported material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available