4.7 Review

Ionotropic and metabotropic mechanisms in chemoreception: 'chance or design'?

Journal

EMBO REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 173-179

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/embor.2010.8

Keywords

olfaction; gustation; receptor; GPCR; ion channel

Funding

  1. University of Lausanne
  2. European Research Council
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemosensory receptors convert an enormous diversity of chemical signals from the external world into a common language of electrical activity in the brain. Mammals and insects use several families of transmembrane receptor proteins to recognize distinct classes of volatile and non-volatile chemicals that are produced by conspecifics or other environmental sources. A comparison of the signalling mechanisms of mammalian and insect receptors has revealed an unexpected functional distinction: mammals rely almost exclusively on metabotropic ligand-binding receptors, which use second messenger signalling cascades to indirectly activate ion channels, whereas insects use ionotropic receptors, which are gated directly by chemical stimuli, thereby leading to neuronal depolarization. In this review, we consider possible reasons for this dichotomy, taking into account biophysical, cell biological, ecological and evolutionary influences on how information is extracted from chemosensory cues by these animal classes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available