4.7 Article

Selective killing of p53-deficient cancer cells by SP600125

Journal

EMBO MOLECULAR MEDICINE
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages 500-514

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/emmm.201200228

Keywords

caspases; HCT 116; high-throughput screening; mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization; MPS1

Funding

  1. Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer
  2. Fondation de France
  3. Apo-Sys
  4. Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan
  5. Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (Equipe labellisee)
  6. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR)
  7. European Commission
  8. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale (FRM)
  9. Institut National du Cancer (INCa)
  10. Canceropole Ile-de-France
  11. Fondation Bettencourt-Schueller
  12. LabEx Onco-Immunology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The genetic or functional inactivation of p53 is highly prevalent in human cancers. Using high-content videomicroscopy based on fluorescent TP53+/+ and TP53-/- human colon carcinoma cells, we discovered that SP600125, a broad-spectrum serine/threonine kinase inhibitor, kills p53-deficient cells more efficiently than their p53-proficient counterparts, in vitro. Similar observations were obtained in vivo, in mice carrying p53-deficient and -proficient human xenografts. Such a preferential cytotoxicity could be attributed to the failure of p53-deficient cells to undergo cell cycle arrest in response to SP600125. TP53-/- (but not TP53+/+) cells treated with SP600125 became polyploid upon mitotic abortion and progressively succumbed to mitochondrial apoptosis. The expression of an SP600125-resistant variant of the mitotic kinase MPS1 in TP53-/- cells reduced SP600125-induced polyploidization. Thus, by targeting MPS1, SP600125 triggers a polyploidization program that cannot be sustained by TP53-/- cells, resulting in the activation of mitotic catastrophe, an oncosuppressive mechanism for the eradication of mitosis-incompetent cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available