4.7 Article

Disease-specific phenotypes in dopamine neurons from human iPS-based models of genetic and sporadic Parkinson's disease

Journal

EMBO MOLECULAR MEDICINE
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages 380-395

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/emmm.201200215

Keywords

autophagy; disease modeling; LRRK2 mutation; neurodegeneration; pluripotent stem cells

Funding

  1. MEC
  2. MICINN [BFU2009-13277, PLE2009-0144, ACI2010-1117, RyC-2008-02772, BFU2010-21823, SAF2008-04360, SAF2009-07774, PLE2009-0089]
  3. FIS [PI10/00849, RD06/0010/0006]
  4. NIH/NIA [AG031782/AG038072]
  5. Fondazione Guido Berlucchi
  6. CMRB [Promt-0901]
  7. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) offer an unprecedented opportunity to model human disease in relevant cell types, but it is unclear whether they could successfully model age-related diseases such as Parkinson's disease (PD). Here, we generated iPSC lines from seven patients with idiopathic PD (ID-PD), four patients with familial PD associated to the G2019S mutation in the Leucine-Rich Repeat Kinase 2 (LRRK2) gene (LRRK2-PD) and four age- and sex-matched healthy individuals (Ctrl). Over long-time culture, dopaminergic neurons (DAn) differentiated from either ID-PD- or LRRK2-PD-iPSC showed morphological alterations, including reduced numbers of neurites and neurite arborization, as well as accumulation of autophagic vacuoles, which were not evident in DAn differentiated from Ctrl-iPSC. Further induction of autophagy and/or inhibition of lysosomal proteolysis greatly exacerbated the DAn morphological alterations, indicating autophagic compromise in DAn from ID-PD- and LRRK2-PD-iPSC, which we demonstrate occurs at the level of autophagosome clearance. Our study provides an iPSC-based in vitro model that captures the patients' genetic complexity and allows investigation of the pathogenesis of both sporadic and familial PD cases in a disease-relevant cell type.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available