4.7 Article

Mycolic acids as diagnostic markers for tuberculosis case detection in humans and drug efficacy in mice

Journal

EMBO MOLECULAR MEDICINE
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 27-37

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/emmm.201100185

Keywords

diagnostic marker; lipidomics; mass spectrometry; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; mycolic acids

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation [2007-04]
  2. Academic Research Fund [R-183-000-160-112]
  3. Biomedical Research Council of Singapore [R-183-000-211-305]
  4. National Medical Research Council [R-183-000-224-213]
  5. NIH, NIAID
  6. European Community [HEALTH-F4-2010-241587]
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [ZIAAI001067] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mycolic acids are attractive diagnostic markers for tuberculosis (TB) infection because they are bacteria-derived, contain information about bacterial species, modulate hostpathogen interactions and are chemically inert. Here, we present a novel approach based on mass spectrometry. Quantification of specific precursor fragment transitions of approximately 2000 individual mycolic acids (MAs) resulted in high analytical sensitivity and specificity. We next used this tool in a retrospective casecontrol study of patients with pulmonary TB with varying disease burdens from South Korea, Vietnam, Uganda and South Africa. MAs were extracted from small volume sputum (200 mu l) and analysed without the requirement for derivatization. Infected patients (70, 19 of whom were HIV+) could be separated from controls (40, 20 of whom were HIV+) with a sensitivity and specificity of 94 and 93%, respectively. Furthermore, we quantified MA species in lung tissue of TB-infected mice and demonstrated effective clearance of MA levels following curative rifampicin treatment. Thus, our results demonstrate for the first time the feasibility and clinical relevance of direct detection of mycobacterial lipids as biomarkers of TB infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available